XJ WEEKLY RELOADED #24

By Punk^·
Hello XJ!

We would like to start off by apologising for the weekly being delayed once again. Due to both staff changes and a growing number of exams coming up for our weekly staff, the weekly have once again been delayed. We would like to thank you all for being patient with us and we will try to keep the weekly on stable release schedule.
Now, let us get started!

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.

1 May 2011, 23:56

Hey guys... My first time posting the weekly, so bare with me if there are any mistakes! If you find anything missing (broken links, grammar errors etc.) please write them in the comments and I'll fix them and keep them in mind for next time. I also know that the info is a little old, but all of us in the weekly team agreed that there was no point in wasting the things we had already written. Now, lean back and enjoy the weekly!

2 May 2011, 00:01

Chasquido and shNz! Go go :D

2 May 2011, 00:05

shNZ beST !

2 May 2011, 00:08

I love weekly's. Gj everyone that contributed! :)

2 May 2011, 00:12

Thank you for the kind words :) It really does seem like I can never quit this game, it always draws me back in somehow.

2 May 2011, 00:20

[b]Lovely weekly GJ[/b]

2 May 2011, 00:29

:up: Punk^

2 May 2011, 00:32

gj all but for me the best bhopper is heL^_x XD not now but on the history of kreedz ofc^^

2 May 2011, 00:40

Why does the weekly contain nearly nothing but reviews? Why does the "reviews" appear as some sort of advertisements, with only using positive words?

2 May 2011, 00:42

CHASQUIDO RLZZZZZZZZ

2 May 2011, 00:43

argentina s2

2 May 2011, 00:47

agree with puppetz, but its always nice to see the weekly! :) gj guys

2 May 2011, 00:51

@puppetz : What you said is not completely true nor false : "...with only using positive words" : If the weekly admin said bad things, he would be giving his own opinion and would get people disagreeing. @myself : "... he would be giving his own opinion..." : That's already done : he said positive things about the clip / movie. In my opinion, a simple description would do it... "a 3:01 minutes long movie featuring Jumper from Country, showing mostly longjumps on normal cs maps, presenting a funky song and rather fast effects. We can critic ourselves ;) Also, good luck with the exams, guys.

2 May 2011, 01:14

Then feel free to come up with suggestions to what else you'd like to see in the weekly puppetz. Also, what would be the point of reviewing a demo/movie and pointing out the bad stuff? We want people to watch the demo/movie.

2 May 2011, 01:58

A Forum without trolls isn't a forum

2 May 2011, 02:00

Now i see why people talk so much about admins abuses since you define a troll as the person that generate troubles on this community.. lol'd at that.

2 May 2011, 02:32

shnz 4eva;p

2 May 2011, 07:03

I had nothing but kind words for this demo release... Why should I?

2 May 2011, 07:04

*Shouldn't...

2 May 2011, 09:34

nice job punk, anyway one space after flags ok? [b]Edit by Punk^: Fixed, I think![/b]

2 May 2011, 09:43

threat us? You meant treat us right? ^^ [b]Edit by Punk^: Thanks, fixed![/b]

2 May 2011, 11:50

gj punk^boi! its also nice to see scary alive... :D

2 May 2011, 13:20

I lol'd so hard after reading thought of the week :D (especially after reading the last paragraph about drinking as a reason for trolling and the metaphores about trimming and uprooting xD ). Aren't you like Sigmund Freud's grandson? You apparently somehow forgot to mention probably the most common reason for trolling and that is simply havin' fun, because trolling can be fun when you know where's the limit. There is a difference between well-aimed sarcasm and mindless spamming.

2 May 2011, 13:44

Nice map reviews.

2 May 2011, 14:26

good reads, good job boyZZ! :up:

2 May 2011, 14:31

i think its should be chip (Chip), akkord (Akkord) and T3dbundy (t3dbundy)

2 May 2011, 15:42

Good weekly, several small mistakes tho'. In the beginning Chasquido and Micron have no flags. 2. "The Argentinean refuseS to let .." "But of course..." 3. zhady - no flag "many have tried to beat it but no one before this release -has- done it" 4."The run itself -has- no mistakes in it, from start to finish there -is- not one wrong jump." Chasquido - no flag "a certain player chooses.." Movies: 3. "Time to move -on-". Hope it helps :)

2 May 2011, 15:55

I find it absolutely ridiculous to think of trollers as nolifers. Why couldn't it be so that the person genually just doesn't care? If you actually have a life, it doesn't matter what other ppl think of you in internet. Anyway once again it was a nice weekly. gj :)

2 May 2011, 16:06

kzua_zp_godroom_h hahahhaahahaha no one get it!! go kkz plx

2 May 2011, 16:29

@Punk: A review is a critical evaluation of something. Your "reviews" are more of an advertisement for the movie/demo - like you said you want people to watch them. If you are to make reviews at all, at least have them contain some kind of critical aspect, like a real review has. I find it unterestering to include reviews as such a big part of the weekly mainly because 1. It is predictable. 2. It has nothing to do with news, which in my opinion should be the dominating part of a weekly. I'm not saying only bad stuff should be pointed out, but at least have some cons and pros so as to put the movie/demo in perspective. I don't read the weekly (except for this one), but what I see is that it doesn't contain any news, which is a shame. Look back in time on XJ's weekly history to get some inspiration of what to put in the weekly. It doesn't have to be revolutionary, but bring news. :)

2 May 2011, 16:32

*uninteresting

2 May 2011, 17:31

Where is XJ Weekly - The movie? Dissmissed or?

2 May 2011, 18:49

gj

2 May 2011, 19:32

"So ladies and gentlemen this week [b]we've have[/b] had a spectacular show[...]"

2 May 2011, 19:36

I agree with puppetz, weekly should be about weeks news. All I read was a bunch of "reviews" and in the case of the world records, there was no review. Merely a compliment to the recorder.

2 May 2011, 20:18

shNz is better!! :D go shNz!! you can do it!) don't give site leader!! it's your place!! =))) go!)

2 May 2011, 20:43

There was also a great amount of complements to be given out this week, don't you agree?

3 May 2011, 04:40

[i]@ Punk^ Gj bro !! You are doing fine with the publishing of weekly :up: Just a lil minor correction of my nick :P Its A3T!U$ :) @ puppetz When I started with the Weekly Reloaded, one my motives was to "highlight" the "newcomers". As a result of which I used to use the "reviews" "with mostly good words" for motivational purposes. And perhaps, knowingly or unknowingly the current weekly team continues with my motive a little bit.. And I completely agree with your opinion that reviews should be a "critical analysis" of a certain thing rather than simply showcasing the good side. I made some humble attempts to do the same in the following weekly, demo reviews specially: http://xtreme-jumps.eu/news.php?extend.1416 But I ended up with comments like "You are not in a position to criticize a World Record cuz you yourself are not a World Record holder and so you dont have the right to criticize".. So, you see, I tried to avoid controversies and continued with the original "advertisement" way. With the current negative attitude of most of the members towards the admins, I didnt want to jeopardize my impression as an admin and tried to be more formal and less personal. And I think most of the admins think in a similar fashion.. However, one could say that I could have asked some experienced and well-known kreedzers to help me out with the reviews, but you know it too its not always possible to get zhady or koukouz to write reviews for the weekly... I also agree with your opinion that weekly should be more about "news" than "reviews". But forums like "Map Nomination" and "Movie Projects" leave us with very little scope to present "new" news to the weekly readers. Anyways, thanx for your valuable suggestions. I hope the weekly team would sure give a serious thought to what you said :) @ Dragon Long time no see. How are you, my friend ?? - Regards A3T!U$ (Sigmund Freud's grandson) [/i]

3 May 2011, 08:50

A3T!U$ you're absolutely correct. I was going to write a comment about the "review" title, but I couldn't come up with any better name for it and still haven't. Currently the reviews aren't reviews which suggests a name change. Knowing this community, I understand that you can't critique someones demo in your "position" which makes this situation even worse. The fact is that the reviews currently are promotions/advertisements, maybe someone with more wit can come up with a witty title for it. Whenever there is a conflict in XJ, there will be a minority who disapproves. Maybe this title can be of one of those little quirks XJ has :). I can be (in) that minority.

3 May 2011, 10:39

This is one of the most weird negative critiques I have ever gotten Puppetz, I couldn't disagree more. You're basicly saying that what you want to read is the excact things that goes on in the records, and still you call my way of of writing predictable? That makes no sense to me. If you want to know what goes on in the record, you should probably just watch it. I try to get the backstory of the map in too, which I think is a vital perspective. Furthermore I draw in the facts surrounding the player, such as Microns comebacks, Wetdreams huge personal release, the fact that shNz is considered the best bhopper ect ect. I chose to write about demos which in my opinion deserves the spotlight - That's my fair privilege as a writer. So let me ask you something, what is it you want me to criticize and why? These guys are doing world records, something only a tiny fraction of this community is able to do. They definitely deserve their just-do's.

3 May 2011, 12:21

Scary puppetz didn't critisize your words, he just said that the text your wrote in consept of a "review" is incorrect. When obviously they are not a review of any sort. Find it rather silly that you though puppetz wants you to write "exact things that goes on in the records". He want's you to [u]review it[/u]

3 May 2011, 13:27

You can't define review like that. Your logic of how a review is defined is too limited, so no my review is not incorrect - Your definition is. Nor are the others reviews incorrect in this weekly. Basicly a review consists of two factors, the fairly black and white which is the technical, which are included in this weekly and then there's the subjective where the writer may include different aspects, such as background history, personal information, facts ect ect. Look it up if you want to. Maybe you don't like to read the weeklies or how they are built, but I don't think there's a curtain hanging above the fact that the weekly is struggling to find people who wants the spend time writing for free. If you really feel like exceeding this weekly, you should sign up and join the crew, instead of spitting venom into an excisiting wound.

3 May 2011, 18:01

Scary, I don't really have to look it up. My teachers in school gave me a hard lession of what reviews need to consist of. What I can look up is a link for you: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/review Let me highlight various words for you: "... again" "retrospectively" "criticism or correction" "critical report" "reexamine". I got bored, those were the first FIVE paragraphs. If you can say my definition on review is wrong (one good hint is to read the word review) I cannot do this anymore. Review always consists of is analyzing the given information. What you have done is indeed given background history, personal information but you have not given is infact unobjective view of the information. Like I said, I understand why you cannot "bash" or even say there's anything wrong about the wr because it's currently the best there is. That's why I was saying change the name. Now I simply wish to redefine the word review into your brain.