Demochecker and Administration Team Update, New Bans, and More
Dear community,
it has been a while since our last big community update. As some of you may have noticed, some of the behind-the-scenes investigations that have been happening for the past year have been recently leaking out. Nevertheless, I am here to share some details about them, without getting too much into the specifics, as well as our current stance on the situation.
I. Removed Head Demochecker Admin - skArp
Making this decision was not easy, and I will point a few of the reasons why:
- The majority of our democheckers agreed that skArp's original world records on one of our partner communities - cosy-climbing - suggest the usage of a cheating software.
- Head Administration also agrees that the behaviour is suspicious, and therefore it is enough evidence for us to remove skArp.
- Conflict of interest is also taken into consideration, because regardless of whether skArp was objective or not with certain suspicious people from the scene, this cannot be ignored when taking action against him.
Nevertheless, skArp, I publicly encourage you to defend your case. You will NOT be banned for the time being, because I will not ignore other evidence provided by some of the other democheckers suggesting your innocence. Of course, given that you are the main suspect, we will not share the details with you, but given your knowledge, you can figure this out on your own, and you can make a sound case for yourself.
However, providing this in-depth defense will not end the conversation. One of our Head Admins - g-Lp has been working on a new demo tool for the past few months. With time when it gets more solid updates, we will be able to also reach a more concrete solution. Until then, you will remain under investigation, and you can open up this investigation to the public yourself.
That means there is still a chance to clear your name, but for now, due to the current state of affairs of your case, it is only natural to remove you from the team.
Furthermore, and I have never revealed this to you before, but since we are revealing some of the investigation process to the public, it would be only fair to mention it - this decision is not based on what just happened in the past 2-3 weeks. This was a long process that started way before you learned anything about it.
So, long story short:
skArp will be removed from his demo position due to majority vote. He will also remain under investigation until more data comes along, and he will also have the possibility to publicly prove his innocence, as long as he explains in detail to both us, and the community, why his records should be deemed clean.
II. New Head Demo Admin position:
For now we will not appoint a new head demo admin. Once we reach a decision, we will let everyone in a community update.
III. Bibika's Permanent Ban
This has been also another long and arduous process. But I will spare the details and simply get straight to the point. Bibika will be permanently banned for the following reasons:
- Spreading cheats
- Excessive attempts of trolling both the demo team, and head administration
This should serve as a reminder not to waste our time when discussing serious matters such as cheating. Depending on how severe your attempt at misleading is, you can, as you just saw with Bibika , receive a permanent ban due to misbehaviour. So I urge everyone to think twice before attempting anything like that again.
IV. Cheating in Partner Communities' Public Servers Rules Update
We will be adding a new rule, effective today, in regards to cheating in public servers.
Cheating in one of our partner communities' public servers will result in a one year ban.
*This includes cheating on alt accounts, as long as there is solid proof about having a connection between your alt account and your main account.
Following this, CamelCloud will be banned from kreedz.com because of him having cheated in more than one partner community, as well as admitting to it.
We hope in the not-so-distant future to have a shared public banlist, with both the old bans and all online bans as well. But that may take a while before it gets updated. For now we will still keep track of this manually.
V. outside's Special In-person Live Check
Now, this topic is a bit different, since it is about one of the most controversial figures for the past few years - outside.
outside has likely had more checks than any other player in existence. Perhaps one day we will get into the details behind the different checking processes he already went through. However, what is important now is this next check, which I personally came up with.
For some further context, skArp came up with another special check recently which he will be allowed to share, but we will not take it into consideration, or any other checks from anyone else anymore. That is also because there'd be a clear conflict of interest doing this, regardless of how good his own check is. Either way, skArp, feel free to write in detail all the steps of the check, as well as all the evidence you have gathered. I demand this to be shared with everyone.
So, the only check we will take into consideration from now on is the one down below:
Recently, ShoCk moved back to Russia, and this opened the opportunity to set up an in-person check of outside.
Given how insistent outside has been to prove his innocence over the past few years, this will be the last and ultimate chance of him being able to prove that, because right now, he is a confirmed cheater who will NOT be unbanned.
The proposition of the check is simple, and it will follow these steps:
1. ShoCk will choose a a random location (could be a LAN café, or his own house) with a PC, keyboard, and a mouse of his choice. The PC will not have access to the internet at first. Preferrably, he will try to pick a similar mouse that outside has at home.
*ShoCk has access to the following mice: a semi-broken g400s, hyperx plusfire, g402, and potentially another zowie mouse.
*When it comes to keyboards: He has one mechanical oclick, and one membrane hyperx.
*Outside's current mouse is: g903.
Depending on whether this check happens or not, we may adjust the peripherals to be as close as possible to what outside has.
2. ShoCk himself will record with his own phone, or camera, the place he has chosen, he will showcase that the PC doesn't have access to the internet, and he himself will first play favourite maps of outside's such as go_fastrun and fastrun. He will record demos on these maps in order to make sure that if any anomalies are also found on outside's demos, they can be properly tracked in ShoCk's demos as well.
3. After that, outside will come in-person, empty handed, all the while every single step from him entering the room, to playing, and then leaving it, will be live filmed. The only thing outside will be allowed to do is to simply sit down and play the game, while ShoCk will be both watching him and filming him. If any of these steps are not met, the check will be deemed as unreliable. He will be required to play for a relatively long session, up to 20-30 minutes on both maps, record his best times, and share the demos with both the democheckers AND the community.
4. After that, they will turn on internet connection, and they will hop in an online server with a good anticheat such as Kreedz.ee's or KZ-Rush's. The same process will be repeated.
5. Next, outside will bring his own keyboard and mouse, and he will repeat steps 3. and 4.
*Excuses such as "I got used to ShoCk's setup, therefore I can't play that well on my own anymore" will not be accepted as valid points for poor display of gameplay.
6. Subsequently ShoCk himself will play with outside's own setup, and he will also repeat steps 3. and 4.
7. We could potentially require for ShoCk to install a custom OS for a proper and secure installation of only one thing alone - CS 1.6. This is however not decided yet, and we will let you know if we do, or if it's even necessary for an additional step like that.
8. I encourage the community to come up with and suggest additional security measures, since there is still time to take this check to the next level.
What are the consequences of this in-person check?
I am personally willing to put my money where my mouth is, and I offer outside 200EUR for costs when it comes to getting to Moscow. I fully realize I may be scammed in the process, but I am willing to get concrete and solid proof, which then I can share with both administration and the community, therefore ending this dilemma once and for all, never to be touched again.
There is more context to this, however, because:
- If outside refuses to do this check - he will remain forever banned in kzcom.
- If outside does the check, and fails to provide the same awe-inspiring ability to play like in his world records, or during some of his other demochecking processes, he will once again remain banned.
- If outside successfully passes the check, he will still remain banned, for the reasons I'll explain down below:
- The majority of our demo team, as well as administration, agree that outside had indeed installed a cheat back in 2021. Whether he knew of that or not, this is his own negligence and every player is responsible for his own attentiveness about such matters. We do not take into consideration lack of awareness by the players.
- The majority of our demo team, as well as administration, believe that if you have a cheat installed on your PC, regardless of whether that gave you an advantage or not, it will be enough for a permanent ban, because it has an effect on your gameplay regardless.
- On top of that, half of the demo team believe that he did in fact benefit from the cheat he used.
- Furthermore, outside himself admitted to having installed the cheat, even though that apology was written by his friend brokoly.
- Outside's new demos have been deemed suspicious enough by several democheckers as well, which is another reason that goes against his unban
- There is another reason which will have to remain undisclosed for now. But it works against outside's favour, and it is related to his original ban from 2021.
With all of this being said, here's what we CAN promise outside in case he passes the check:
I will personally make an official statement apologizing to outside for doubting his current ability to play, and we will strongly defend that any of his recent records he did are indeed possible. We obviously cannot prove with this kind of check that all of his records are clean, but as long as the entire in-person process is shared to everyone, we could reach a potential agreement both within administration, and the community, for an unban in the upcoming 1-2 years. However, there still won't be a guarantee that he will be unbanned, given his original transgressions from 2021. Sometimes players are indeed skilled enough to pull off the impossible, but that doesn't mean we will close our eyes for what they have done in the past.
In short, we will fully defend outside as playing cleanly in present time, but that would not yield an immediate unban, or if at all.
VI. brokoly's Case and Other Suspicious Cases
Recently I went in to investigate as to why brokoly was not affected by the cross-community ban rule.
This is where we will have to slow down a bit, since it will require more time to come up with a good solution for unresolved issues from the past, such as brokoly's case, who is banned to this day in cosy-climbing, but not in kreedz.com.
We will also tackle other suspicious players, be it new or old, but for that I ask you for your patience before doing a similar newspost like this one indicating further action (or lack thereof) towards brokoly and/or other players.
VII. ShoCk Steps Down From the Head Manager Role
As you are aware, a few months ago ShoCk made a newspost effectively announcing that I will be the new Head Manager of this community, mostly because of ShoCk's inactivity. However, he wished to step down from his Head Manager role because he is not sure if he will have enough free time to continue act as a secondary Head Manager. Nevertheless, he will remain part of management as a Head Admin.
VIII. Cosy-Climbing Upcoming News
Soon, there will be other news in relation to Cosy-Climbing and kreedz.com. Once we sync up with the Cosy-Climbing administration, I will update this one as well with all the relevant facts.
Yours,
Kreedz.com