Fps Difference
If Someone is wondering whats the difference between 100 fps and 500 take a look at this , its kinda old 1 month but now i decided to upload it... [B00R1|\|G]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF88YSLYQIU
Firstly, this should not be in this forum.
Secondly, you can't actually see the difference of all these, mainly because youtube strips the fps of your clip down to 30 fps, but also because you used the same output fps for all of them in vegas.
Thirdly, the only reason you should record with more than 200 fps, should be because you want to slow down the clip a lot. You don't get any extra smoothness with a clip that's 1000 fps vs. one with 200 fps. Only way to see a difference in smoothness would be by increasing the output fps in vegas, and there is really no reason to do that :)
FPS 101 is now over, enjoy
haha fail
dont see any difference
i think it is one and the same demo:D
because when i try even 300 fps i go alot longer
26/09/2010 13:15Originally posted by musakadont see any difference
difference is more than seeable, but not at yt. tj looks good btw.
Originally posted by Lazze!Firstly, this should not be in this forum.
Secondly, you can't actually see the difference of all these, mainly because youtube strips the fps of your clip down to 30 fps, but also because you used the same output fps for all of them in vegas.
Thirdly, the only reason you should record with more than 200 fps, should be because you want to slow down the clip a lot. You don't get any extra smoothness with a clip that's 1000 fps vs. one with 200 fps. Only way to see a difference in smoothness would be by increasing the output fps in vegas, and there is really no reason to do that :)
FPS 101 is now over, enjoy
Poooom! Headshot !
Originally posted by Lazze!Only way to see a difference in smoothness would be by increasing the output fps in vegas, and there is really no reason to do that :)
all you said was correct but that's not rly true. just capture 200fps and capture 1000fps and render both to your fav. output fps. you will definitly see a difference in the motionblur and therefore in the objective "smoothness" of the vid aswell, since reducing such a high ammount of fps leaves it's traces.
well for your vid icevip, i cant see any difference tbh (prolly cause of youtube and the bad quality for me... umts internet haha)
Originally posted by I RUSSIA!i think it is one and the same demo:D
because when i try even 300 fps i go alot longer
Dude, its PFS input, not the fps ingame, lol.
Originally posted by k a f f e eOriginally posted by Lazze!Only way to see a difference in smoothness would be by increasing the output fps in vegas, and there is really no reason to do that :)
all you said was correct but that's not rly true. just capture 200fps and capture 1000fps and render both to your fav. output fps. you will definitly see a difference in the motionblur and therefore in the objective "smoothness" of the vid aswell, since reducing such a high ammount of fps leaves it's traces.
You are right about that. But in theory you could receive the same result by just increasing the output fps in vegas. And that would save time ;)
I think this was the most pointless video I've seen so far.
Even alittle more pointless then the "I'm 16 years and to old for cs so I quit and come back in 2 months geeking my ass off good bye" movies.
Originally posted by BAEVERN^I think this was the most pointless video I've seen so far.
Even alittle more pointless then the "I'm 16 years and to old for cs so I quit and come back in 2 months geeking my ass off good bye" movies.
rofl agree :D
I tried to find difference between jumps and then read this comments :D
Originally posted by BAEVERN^I think this was the most pointless video I've seen so far.
30/09/2010 20:10(edited 30/09/2010 20:10)Originally posted by musakadont see any difference
i will remember that footsteps sound for the rest of my life
what difference? :(
Please log in to post replies.