265 Standup Double-Countjump

Started by Mathzz
10/09/2012 17:56
Page 1 of 1
Mathzz10/09/2012 17:56(edited 10/09/2012 17:57)

Hello, I've been trying to land the 265 block for quite some time now, and now I finally managed to pull it off. I was surprised once I saw that I had landed over 269 stats. Reason is because I never failed higher than 266-267 stats. So I was probably lucky as hell right there. Anyways, I don't know the limits and block records others have done with the standup technique (if there are even any), so I just went straight to 265 block to practice on. Luckily I landed it today, with amazing 269 units stats. :-)

ps: Also I didn't want to edit it, I just wanted to keep it clean to show the jump.

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ar8016kpXbs

If demo needed, send me a personal message here in xj or youtube.

dyna10/09/2012 18:17

:)

Juice10/09/2012 18:37

and the point of this is?..

Mathzz10/09/2012 18:51

Originally posted by Juice ._.
and the point of this is?..


Quite many actually, such as testing and investigate the technique further. I've seen people say that stand-up cj techniques in aa10 is impossible, so I decided to prove them wrong. Also, I was just testing myself to see how far I could push it. In other words, I was mainly just doing it for the test purpose and to find out more about the technique in default settings. :-)

xdrive10/09/2012 18:57

Gnomas did it few years ago bro :( with standup cj.. search for it on youtube

papr1ka-hns10/09/2012 19:15

goood)

FLP10/09/2012 19:33

Yeah Gnomas did 265 block with standup countjump

jack frog10/09/2012 19:41

You should've geeked the 269 block, lol. Anyways good job!

Mathzz10/09/2012 19:47

@ganja; @FLP: Yeah, so I've heard.

@Jack: There is no way I would want to geek any higher blocks. Timing the edge is a nightmare :-(

zythH^ moviemaker10/09/2012 21:46

In my opinion this isn't the correct Standup Double-Countjump since you only made the standup after the 2nd duck, still a good jump anyway.

Mathzz10/09/2012 22:31(edited 10/09/2012 22:38)

Originally posted by zythH^
In my opinion this isn't the correct Standup Double-Countjump since you only made the standup after the 2nd duck, still a good jump anyway.


Might be, but I don't see it possible to do it with both ducks in aa10. It would block you in mid air while doing standup + duck + turn (pre). I would say the maximum limit you would reach that way is probably not even 260 stats, pre somewhere -279. (I might be wrong, because I never truly tested it, but knowing cs and aa10 including the logic of doing pre, I would assume it to be impossible). This is the only way to do "sdcj" properly in aa10 (if you want to jump further).

But certainly I won't argue with those who indeed perform it and finds a way to master it properly. :-)

Feliz Navidad10/09/2012 22:59

omg ._. ; good Mathzz

zythH^ moviemaker10/09/2012 23:26

Originally posted by Mathzz
Originally posted by zythH^
In my opinion this isn't the correct Standup Double-Countjump since you only made the standup after the 2nd duck, still a good jump anyway.


Might be, but I don't see it possible to do it with both ducks in aa10. It would block you in mid air while doing standup + duck + turn (pre). I would say the maximum limit you would reach that way is probably not even 260 stats, pre somewhere -279. (I might be wrong, because I never truly tested it, but knowing cs and aa10 including the logic of doing pre, I would assume it to be impossible). This is the only way to do "sdcj" properly in aa10 (if you want to jump further).

But certainly I won't argue with those who indeed perform it and finds a way to master it properly. :-)


I said, I think this is not the correct, I didnt say the correct is possible :)
But your logic seems legit to me, but I still think for Standup Double-Countjump you need to Standup Countjump and not only one :)

Page 1 of 1

Please log in to post replies.