Count Style Jumps
Hey i made this thread for you to show the best jump u can find with the Count style...(ducking and then jumping...)
Here is mine... nuke roof to rock with awp =P is not the best i can do but...
http://www.sendspace.com/file/6jnfie
did the nuke jump with awp 3 times in a few tries :P will look for some others soon
[ Edited Mon Feb 26 2007, 09:06PM ]
Gj did it 3 times in a row with count tech :D a littel while ago.
"did this jump with famas http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/5492/dasddzw7.jpg
[ Edited Mon Feb 26 2007, 09:13PM ]
which button u a use 4 duck?
i use ALT-CTRL dont work good waaa?
[ Edited Mon Feb 26 2007, 10:08PM ]
which button u a use 4 duck?
i use ALT-CTRL dont work good waaa?
No that would be uberhard. :)
jump MWHEELDOWN
duck MWHEELUP
ahh oke thx, i try your style^^
imo its crap to show jumps which are also possible without that technique its just lame
maybe its good for shortcuts or its own section but not for normal jumpstuff imo
it destroys everything
for instance i beat the nukeump with awp which is really amazing and then comes a noob with that technique and also say it its really annoying imo
[ Edited Mon Feb 26 2007, 11:27PM ]
t3d did it without this technique (awp) :D
t3d did it without this technique (awp) :D
We all know t3d is just above everyone else in terms of skills. :P
@Insen.
I really don't know what your talking about with this noob idea. . .Count can do 250+ ljs with the normal strafe style. If thats what you are talking about. This technique is used to facilitate everything and if you have a problem about some "noob" comes and invents another legit jumping technique. So yes, I have a problem with you being critical about this.
[ Edited Tue Feb 27 2007, 12:18AM ]
imo its crap to show jumps which are also possible without that technique its just lame
maybe its good for shortcuts or its own section but not for normal jumpstuff imo
it destroys everything
for instance i beat the nukeump with awp which is really amazing and then comes a noob with that technique and also say it its really annoying imo
The point of this thread was to show new sc's and stuff.. i just post that jump becauze i am noob at that technique... and it don't destroy everythign imo.. it open doors to many new jumps and sc... i know old school jumps cant be replaced but if someone find a new technique they can be improved..
yes but it sucks to show jumps with that technique which also can be done with the normal technique
its much easier, its the same if u post the nukejump with m4 or so which is really easy(with the normal technique)
so imo its senseless to post so many "new" jumps with that new tech which are already known
this not only counts for this thread its in general "senseless" for me
lol with this technique everithnig is easy :// maby this nuke jumps would ne cool if youd jumped with ~5awp ;]
So this jump is like do nuke cliff with usp..
For sure not antye it is pretty hard to do with this tech jsut try it yourself..
Can someone make a little video of this jump with count technik?I mean the nuke awp jump.
tjubby I did nuke with awp Oo.
I agree that ~248+ longjump with this techn is 1337 , but not the nuke cliff with awp :E
[ Edited Tue Feb 27 2007, 03:02PM ]
what's the "count jump" rec?? 253?
I just can do 250 now.
And imo,if u do the nuke jump roof to rock with awp,that's not hard,i mean with count jump.
Here's my demo,nuke roof to rock,http://www.sendspace.com/file/vojqnx
it takes me 3 tries.
No its not hard but to do it like 3 times in a row is very hard :D
yes but it sucks to show jumps with that technique which also can be done with the normal technique
its much easier, its the same if u post the nukejump with m4 or so which is really easy(with the normal technique)
so imo its senseless to post so many "new" jumps with that new tech which are already known
this not only counts for this thread its in general "senseless" for me
word
http://download.kzno.org/Stasj/1.rar
And yes, i agree with InseN. Its a good feeling to pwn like nuke awp but its not that hard and ofc not something to showoff with. But hard sc or hardish sc`s like this 1 http://download.kzno.org/Stasj/3.rar u can do it much easier with ddbhop and somting to show..
if this technique is so important than a guide should be made or something imo
Please log in to post replies.