interview koukouz

What affected me in this one, is the honesty and the franchise of your interlocutor. He seems to reveal a light but subtle indifference to the dialogues, the dialogues which are from an essential point of this exchange because he allows the meeting of 2 spirits in one union such as only a dogmatism acute could make him tilt. However I cannot stay stone-faced in front of such a doggedness, not physically but intellectually, to this way of thinking and to act. A powerful aura, working such a spiral which would absorb any entity passing in its surroundings, which cannot subjugate us. In the end, in spite of my opinion which can seem harmless and worthless, I think sincerely that your interview had to change the world. In spite of my way of thinking, I remain outraged by the fact that this dear sir did not have deepens his reality notion of the interview. Indeed, this is harmful because there was one reality subject to be thought and to be worked. Thing which remains rare in an anastigmatic and empirical world. I have to leave at the moment, I may hold on no longer in front of the question of the selectivity nephrotic interview and of them definitive dogmatism.

Thank you.

EDIT: Sorry, I've no idea about why I've write that

Originally posted by g-Lp

What affected me in this one, is the honesty and the franchise of your interlocutor. He seems to reveal a light but subtle indifference to the dialogues, the dialogues which are from an essential point of this exchange because he allows the meeting of 2 spirits in one union such as only a dogmatism acute could make him tilt. However I cannot stay stone-faced in front of such a doggedness, not physically but intellectually, to this way of thinking and to act. A powerful aura, working such a spiral which would absorb any entity passing in its surroundings, which cannot subjugate us. In the end, in spite of my opinion which can seem harmless and worthless, I think sincerely that your interview had to change the world. In spite of my way of thinking, I remain outraged by the fact that this dear sir did not have deepens his reality notion of the interview. Indeed, this is harmful because there was one reality subject to be thought and to be worked. Thing which remains rare in an anastigmatic and empirical world. I have to leave at the moment, I may hold on no longer in front of the question of the selectivity nephrotic interview and of them definitive dogmatism.

Thank you.

EDIT: Sorry, I've no idea about why I've write that

C O O L L E R detected

how did he do

kkz is deded ripperino in kkzronis

yeah i would of liked to see av3k too but oh well

also rapha just lost to tox my mind is blown. hes playing out of his mind this tournament

Originally posted by ShoCk

pavel is ripped apart, too bad qcon won't see cooller ; (

Originally posted by pizza^

yeah i would of liked to see av3k too but oh well

also rapha just lost to tox my mind is blown. hes playing out of his mind this tournament

fk u kkz ;d