my suggestion: ban sooshka
Originally posted by iNsprateOriginally posted by WOOF.exeThis thread contained abit too much flame for my taste.
P.S: Lack of originality iNsprate ...
There is no way you miss a post of mine to quizzaciously reply to it.
Dont ban him, sooshka is intelligentt and great guy
20/12/2015 04:46Originally posted by killahurtZDont ban him, sooshka is intelligentt and great guy
and aids is good for your health
who is shooska?
20/12/2015 08:45I actually like this guy
Do you really think staff members would not watch a user that has been banned and warned previously? Just let the admins do their work.
"lol "everyone"? I don't think so. I'm not African/Muslim enough for Sweden. Swedish politicians prefer Somalis since they know they'll wreak the most havoc in society and piss off the native population the most."
This is a fact. You should remove it from list. If they will import muslims they will destroy their country. rip sweden soon.
And don't ban the one who is making jokes seriously
20/12/2015 12:28Originally posted by D@NG3R`I actually like this guy
!! you boys take everything too serious ... life didn't hit you hard enough yet? I'd rather be more focused on how to save the game from it's certain death ... dunno, just me?
Originally posted by sooshka...
I didn't impute something to you that doesn't fit into your self-presentation. You are not necessarily a national socialist if you advocate völkisch ideas and nationalism, but, as for example you can see with your metaphors referring to animals, which are completly analogous to passages written by Hitler, you share an elementary characteristic with NS: biological racism. Since Hitler is the most famous representative of a ideology based on racism, i used this fact to avoid going into detail, when demonstrating the racism of your statements. It's simply an effective method of proof and i did not compare you to Hitler in every aspect.
About this "Alt Right" video: Although it is not my primary field of action i am studying right-wing politics and ideology, especially the New Right for some years now. In a field of finely differing political spectra i would probably place your views more accurate than you would estimate yourself (because i have a very big IQ and an even bigger penis, just saying). I'm familiar with the topic, i don't put you into wrong category.
Since you are a scientist you should have acquired the skills to use clear definitions and explanations. To help the admins decide about your case, you could answer the following questions.
(1) What statements or actions should be considered racist? (Definition)
(2) Do you consider yourself racist? (Yes/No; Why is this classification reasonable?)
(3) Do you think racism is negative? (Freestyle: Your views on racism (as defined in (1)))
Btw, illegal answer to question (1): None.
lol, i think the most unnecessary thread on xj, and lol its not in offtopic
20/12/2015 15:59(edited 20/12/2015 19:09)[blockquote]decide about your case,[/blockquote]
there is no case, you seem a little delusional. Just because you got drunk one night and decided to search my old posts in order to get offended on purpose, then made a thread to complain about it, doesn't mean there's a case. Also, as far as I know, in real life as well as on xj there is a thing called double jeopardy, I already got banned for posting political stuff here which isn't allowed, so you definitely don't have a case lol. You might as well ban napz again for using movement recorder on kz_cg_venice while you're on it?
this thread is utterly useless.
Also, in order for me to answer your questions, you need to first define "racism", fool. It's hard to keep track living in a progressive world where everything is racist.
Now, I haven't done a challenge in a while and I feel a bit guilty about it, the last one was for extremebeachrace in 2010 I think it was? So I think I might do a new one, I might challenge admins to perma ban kaffee, and if they do, a sum of 50 dollars will be donated to xj :). Now, I said I might do that, depending on how you answer the following questions to help me with your case.
Since I think you had a German flag before, and you speak German, and you and Hitler both thought 2+2 equals to 4, and he was your ancestor, I think you have far too much in common with him. So I'm going to do my Hitler test on you.
1) Do you want to kill 6 million jews?
2) Do you want to invade Russia?
3) Are you secretly organizing the fourth reich?
4) Are you building any concentration camps by any chance?
5) How often do you take a shower?
6) Have you ever had homosexual fantasies?
7) Have you ever scratched your butt in public?
Ok if you're not associated with Hitler, I am so sorry, I have another set of questions:
1) Do you support open borders?
2) Do you think Sweden has no right to control its borders or who they let in?
3) Do you care if Swedes go extinct and get replaced by a completely different people with different culture?
4) Are you a traitor to your nation?
5) If you support open borders, are you ready to take the responsiblity for the Paris attacks since they occured because of a policy that you support? Do you have blood on your hands?
Thanks, depending upon on how you answer, I'll decide on whether I'll go through with the challenge or not.
P.S stop using google translate.
P.P.S, <3 you too bluex and others.
Oh and questions to others, what happened to Coppenst? He was a good admin. and when is "of the year 2015" coming?
Oh and Cobrex, the way to bring tons of activity to xj is to implement cs:go, why do you think I want cs:go on here lol? To play it? No, to make kzmod way more popular.
Oh i hope sooshka wont 'fall' on kaffee's provocations, and becouse of that got banned haha
@sooshka, isnt it better to say 'ok, you win, you are a legend' and dont reply anymore..?:D
Originally posted by sooshkaOriginally posted by throttleIll support both finzer and kaffee on this.
Acting acidic, leaving a strong sense of pseudo-superiority is a sign of a totally insecure person. Being pretentious with such a weak, /pol/ basis is like being a walking joke, personally, I never took anything written by sooshka seriously. And Im not judging the man behind this alias, Im judging what he writes here, at this community. Even after so much personality revealing posts, I still dont think that this person can be fully represented by his words here, I dont know this man. But again, this doesnt change the fact that he is being cancerous to xj.
Theres nothing more childish than disrespecting the ethics. Rude, impolite behavior to anyone, working class person or academic, doesnt matter, should not be welcomed anywhere, for obvious reasons. Being ridiculously primitive, thus radical, in world views and as a consequence, constantly throwing labels on everything and everyone, showing us the "truth", the "naked world" *laughs*. Considering your own opinion as the most objective, that stands on facile, shallow argumenting, being inflexible to others' considerations and views, this is infantile. This is what disgusts me the most, yet, ironically, so routine and typical, something that you would notice everyday anywhere. So as the others usually do, keep it to yourself, these worldviews your beliefs are based on, keep using them as your daily self-affirmation tools, dont pour them onto the heads that still have some thinking abilities.
I dont want to dive further into analysis, revealing my whole notion of this topic, because things will get more messy and personal.
I left enough of my own superiority in this words. Time for some weak argumenting and abusing sooshka.
Your antisocial, social justice warrior -throttle.
[blockquote]Being ridiculously primitive[/blockquote]
Talking about yourself?
[blockquote]Being pretentious with such a weak, /pol/ basis is like being a walking joke[/blockquote]
Actually I think being a politically correct leftist believing the lies of mainstream media is like being a walking joke, to each their own I guess.
[blockquote]I still dont think that this person can be fully represented by his words here, I dont know this man.[/blockquote]
Indeed, you don't know a single thing about me. Probably the only useful thing you've said in that useless ramble.
[blockquote]But again, this doesnt change the fact that he is being cancerous to xj.
[/blockquote]
Yeah, nevermind that the "quotes" are taken out of context, which are mostly in defense of an insult or something insane being said.
[blockquote]Considering your own opinion as the most objective, that stands on facile, shallow argumenting[/blockquote]
Yeah well, I think since I've actually done research, my comments are actually informed. Do you think Einstein doesn't have an advantage over anyone in a Physics debate too?
[blockquote]keep using them as your daily self-affirmation tools, dont pour them onto the heads that still have some thinking abilities.[/blockquote]
This message is perfect, if it was being directed at wemera, lol.
[blockquote]constantly throwing labels on everything and everyone[/blockquote]
Kind of like kaffee and the others with "racist" (not even knowing what that means), and "hitler", right?
[blockquote]Time for some weak argumenting and abusing sooshka.
Your antisocial, social justice warrior -throttle.[/blockquote]
Not sure what you meant there bud, but just stick to playing fu_extreme, everyone will be happier.
You keep forgetting that I was already banned by FAME after my comment towards kayne, and I haven't done it since. So again, what's the problem?
@kaffee, you want to become like nazi germany and police people's opinions? Ironic, since you just complained about hitler in your op.
[blockquote]Being ridiculously primitive[/blockquote]
Talking about yourself?
Damn thats, thats just, holy shit. Are you really that helpless? I think I was 8 when I last used redirection in the conversation. Your perception is clearly distorted by the ego defence tools. You just cannot read right? Cannot analyze anything properly. Its a big flaming battle to you, you gotta win, listen, gotta win. Gotta nail that kid right? Gotta show him whos the man. Instead of actual grasping / analyzing the argument, you either redirect it to me or to someone else,
[blockquote]keep using them as your daily self-affirmation tools, dont pour them onto the heads that still have some thinking abilities.[/blockquote]
This message is perfect, if it was being directed at wemera, lol.
or just pretend you didnt see it or, again, you just didnt see it, because you are undoubtably, now, cutted your eyes out to feel safe.
Actually I think being a politically correct leftist believing the lies of mainstream media is like being a walking joke, to each their own I guess.
I never mentioned my political views, this statement based on absolutely nothing but a try to prove yourself right. Youre just not. That was a severe insult to me for you to reckon that I believe in what is media saying, isnt that was obvious after that wall of text I wrote? Ah you didnt even read it properly, classics.
Indeed, you don't know a single thing about me. Probably the only useful thing you've said in that useless ramble.
Your words value nothing. You cant insult anyone with them, you did it to yourself by yourself, playing with radicalism. I see it as another proof that you have percept my response in a typical, bydlo way. Ive explained already how and why that happened, and again, you just cannot analyze it seriously, with a full understanding of whats written and to whom.
Dont you think we all know your sources of information? I may be wrong and this doesnt end on 4chan, even on the internet itself, but it doesn't matter. It's about you and your ways of using it and applying it, assuming your "sources" are true would be probably wrong in the first place, but how you perceive it, and I judge your perception by the stuff you wrote, this, is what undoubtedly make you wrong. And, I must add this, youre obviously not always wrong in you primitive understandings of what is "actually" going in the world, because its incredibly easy for anyone, It's the depth of your thinking that makes it ridiculous, and, in fact, the need to express yourself on some completely unrelated jumping forums - its an act of dominance through the projection of your "forbidden" knowledge. But for me, it's just another "oh here we go again", and I dont think Im alone on this. Not all the people around are that stupid, you have to say it yourself all the time, I guess.Yeah well, I think since I've actually done research, my comments are actually informed. Do you think Einstein doesn't have an advantage over anyone in a Physics debate too?
[blockquote]constantly throwing labels on everything and everyone[/blockquote]
Kind of like kaffee and the others with "racist" (not even knowing what that means), and "hitler", right?
Not like that. By labeling I meant something way deeper. You see, when you call someone with the a really really abstract and flexible word in its definition, you wont be wrong because theres a high chance that it will fit, thats how astrology works, for example. In fact, as it may seem, you will be right, but you are not, just because you used it. The language itself is labeling of the phenomena and processes, but when you explain yourself something complex in a really abstract terms, easing your task of cognition of this phenomenon, you "close your eyes" on a really important features and exclusions, connected only with this particular act. Thats, again, an everyday mistake, that all of us do all the time, and its also a really good index of personality's mental capacities. When you insult / call someone with stuff like "80 iq kid", "retard", "social justice warrior" it's obviously incorrect. But who cares right, it's just an act of humiliation. But the real problems occur when you discuss politics. Being radical in conclusions is actually totally related to the labeling problem. Your depth of thinking is usually inversly proportional to the simplicity of the conclusions. For example, Sweden and refugees topic, its radical solution is incredibly easy, but there are more complex solutions which will do less harm and wont bring any weighty consequences. Theyre just really hard to think of, because the need to be aware of all the circumstances, all the far future disasters appeared because of this decision, like russian import to sweden in the next 50 years after the act, or something like that, all the moral aspects, which, I agree, are ridiculous, but nevertheless, alas, important, attach them to a solution module, sort out all the non-linearity, and bring that model to live is a really hard task thats obviously not for you to think of, so keep your views to yourself, thats the whole point. Either you write walls of text about it or you dont write it at all. You cannot express something theoretically, and practically hard and complex in 1 sentence and wont distort or totally lose the information. Thats how things work in this universe. You are not allowed to use the word "simple", unless its the best best practical solution, well, profoundly thought of, that is simple. Its an extremely rare case that something in this world is simple. It's you who didnt feel the need to think when there are, seemingly, 2-3 options you can do. It's an illusion because the other options either subjectively impossible or require immense work both on a theory and in practice, thus you lower that bar down for yourself, imposing, keep telling yourself to enjoy what you still possess.
[blockquote]Time for some weak argumenting and abusing sooshka.
Your antisocial, social justice warrior -throttle.[/blockquote]
Not sure what you meant there bud, but just stick to playing fu_extreme, everyone will be happier.
Ive just won 5$, I knew you would mention fu_extreme.
Listen, Ive been texting with guys your type of cognition or worse for years on russian servers, it turned into a weekly approval of their incapability of rational thinking, and "throttle" as a dumb fuck synonym in their circles. Im sorry for being that abstract, but being concrete would cost me a lot of my precious time. Since what Im writing is absolutely useless and you wont just "free from the shackles of your perception" and absorb this argumentation as something to chew on, as a basis of reconsiderations, I'd better be going. Hope is not lost though, as they say.
Except on the American continent, I hardly think double jeopardy is accurate in any other law systems. Therefore arguing here about it is rather pointless.
Needless to say Kaffee is provocative here (posting outta nowhere an essay for some random posts) but that doesn't mean we shall all praise his ideas only because Sooshka has nasty views.
20/12/2015 16:58Originally posted by throttle....
ok mr. "cutted", relax, I don't even know you. Kinda awkward writing long furious essays that took days to write to a person you don't even know, don't you think? Is this your way of venting frustration at failing on fu_extreme? I think you should get right back to it though, gotta do it fast to catch insprate's 100$ bonus before 2016.
Anyway, waiting for kaffee to answer my questions since I'm on his case now.
wow, dont ban him, hes a really awesome guy ! <3
take a better look around you guys
at first I thought this thread is a joke , but wow , you guys must have too much free time
20/12/2015 17:24Originally posted by throttle
not sure what you mean by that pic you freak, someone care to explain?