240-246 no mistakes

Started by IGNA
12/04/2007 04:54
Page 1 of 3
IGNA12/04/2007 04:54

im pretty happy i could pwn this.. http://rapidshare.com/files/25535402/240-246noproblem.rar

i hope u like it

cu round

o btw i did 251 x 2! just wanted to share it with u.. i didnt record the first one.. but hell just to tell u xD although u might not probably believe me without demo XP still im happy

cuuu

Volsfootball12/04/2007 05:30

nice, wasn't there a contest back then about this, or did you create that contest?

M!nn0W12/04/2007 08:55

I think 246-250 will n1 for you IGNA.. (w/o falls :D)

Volsfootball13/04/2007 00:28

I would like to see that out of any jumper. :)

ANtye13/04/2007 08:26

I whant your strafes :}
I did only 249x2, but my record is only 251.. so Im cool XD

M!nn0W13/04/2007 08:34

249x2 easy (examplre for faker..) for me 2
251x3 i did 1 time..

Tafatt13/04/2007 12:44

M!nn0W: wow 251x3 do you have demo on that?
If so upload it please. :D

ANtye13/04/2007 12:57

dam, M!nn0W, I dont belive ;DD
your record is 251 ;F

DRUNKEN MASTER13/04/2007 12:58

biao did it or?
3x251 with hacks lol :)

Pulsar!13/04/2007 12:59

biao did it, but with hack. That's shit.

ichirou13/04/2007 15:35

I think kz jumpers these days train too much longjumps :)
There's very many that can jump over like 247? Even though they can't complete some maps where the longest lj is 240?

I don't really get it... if I tell people my lj record is 250 I'm almost getting this response "Omg lol, you're so noob.. .my record is 251!!!"... and then their fastest time on kz_cliffez is on 3:30 ;S

You get what I mean right? This is from my personal experience only tho... but kz jumpers these days are better at longjumping than actual fast climbing. Most are actually unnecessary too good at longjumping considering the diffuculty of todays longjumps in the maps.

I'm just rambling... I've just been a bit confused lately :D

Edit:

249x2 easy (examplre for faker..) for me 2

Minn0w

I'm sure I could do this... but it would probably take one/two hours of pure geeking or something and you say it's easy? What does easy really mean in your opinions ;S
[ Edited Fri Apr 13 2007, 03:38PM ]

Bibo13/04/2007 15:40

well its much easier to practice lj, cuz if you fall it takes 2 seconds and you have an other chance, but on kz maps, if you fall its kinda long till you get to the end again.. and ljs are usefull for scs so if they can do 250 but they cant do 240x2, thats their problem dude!

if youre a good ljer, it means you have a high lj rec, AND you have that skill constant! you dont have to get ÜBER lucky when you land 245+.. just need skills!
[ Edited Fri Apr 13 2007, 03:41PM ]

DRUNKEN MASTER13/04/2007 15:42

ya^^ for example me LOHL^^

ichirou13/04/2007 15:43

well its much easier to practice lj, cuz if you fall it takes 2 seconds and you have an other chance, but on kz maps, if you fall its kinda long till you get to the end again.. and ljs are usefull for scs so if they can do 250 but they cant do 240x2, thats their problem dude!

if youre a good ljer, it means you have a high lj rec, AND you have that skill constant! you dont have to get ÜBER lucky when you land 245+.. just need skills!

Bibo


Ye, what I told is more from a "completing kz map"-perspective.. in both time and what's that is considered "hard"/"easy".

Tafatt13/04/2007 15:55

I agree. Just because you can jump 250's doesn't make you a good climber.

sbzvln Tournament #213/04/2007 17:38

soo true ichi -

and ndr is very right too

||
\/
[ Edited Fri Apr 13 2007, 07:26PM ]

akM13/04/2007 18:40

word up ichirou

ndR Tournament #213/04/2007 18:51

It makes me laugh =)

Currently, almost everybody thinks like that:
good longjumper = good climber
good bhopper = good climber
fast climber = good climber
pro recorder = good climber

Almost all of you are wrong.

How many times have I seen guys who did 250+ and who were (very) bad @ climbing?
Too many times...

Just look at the LJ thread, look how many jumpers pwnd 250 and spect' them in a public server.
You will laugh.

It's just an example among many others...

You are a good climber only, and only if:
you can finish MANY maps,
you can climb easily on all kinds of map (block, hard, bhop, easy etc...),
you have constancy (you can climb quickly, and without falling 999xxx times)
and if you are patient.

Just think about everything I said previously,
you will have another glance on the concept of skill, in this 'kz-world'...

[ Edited Fri Apr 13 2007, 06:55PM ]

Maxohhz13/04/2007 19:37

big wooord @ ndR


btw some days ago i did 240-245 with no mistakes, and couldn't make 246 :(

gj IGNAcho

KNiFEAR13/04/2007 20:46

It makes me laugh =)

Currently, almost everybody thinks like that:
good longjumper = good climber
good bhopper = good climber
fast climber = good climber
pro recorder = good climber

Almost all of you are wrong.

How many times have I seen guys who did 250+ and who were (very) bad @ climbing?
Too many times...

Just look at the LJ thread, look how many jumpers pwnd 250 and spect' them in a public server.
You will laugh.

It's just an example among many others...

You are a good climber only, and only if:
you can finish MANY maps,
you can climb easily on all kinds of map (block, hard, bhop, easy etc...),
you have constancy (you can climb quickly, and without falling 999xxx times)
and if you are patient.

Just think about everything I said previously,
you will have another glance on the concept of skill, in this 'kz-world'...

ndR


yep, big word on that and on ichirous post..any1 can do a 250 nowdays:D if ya watch the lj thread and watch the 250 lj demos..man most demos suxx, even tho it's 250 :D

Page 1 of 3

Please log in to post replies.