Pwnage *Quality / Colour Test* - (bug @ surf

Started by V0ncH...
05/04/2009 08:14
Page 1 of 2
V0ncH...05/04/2009 08:14(edited 09/04/2009 11:37)

v0nch here...
I just found a bug on 'surf_hax' and wanted to make a short movie :D to test skills + quality..(movie is mainly to test quality + some colours).
so here it is :)

--people have been flaming, and i just wonna make sure, this vid is to test colours (it says b4, to "test skills + quality")

Youtube (WATCH IN HD):

--> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBsPvurAoCY&fmt=22

Download HQ: (download this!) (imo the compression pwnz :)

--> http://www.sendspace.com/file/ilu0xi

Edited / Director: V0ncH.akz0
Surfer: V0ncH.akz0
Length: 00:49
Size: 22mb
Codec: XviD (ftw! 22mb/49sec:) )

peace out...]

DaFox05/04/2009 08:25(edited 05/04/2009 08:26)

Try out h.264, xvid fails in comparison.

V0ncH...05/04/2009 08:51

Originally posted by DaFox
Try out h.264, xvid fails in comparison.

--lol i duno how to xD... is h264 -AVC?

mp4/avi etc. + is there any guides lol... sorry i sux,, i only use xvid,, sometimes x264 vfw.avi

beuhnoix05/04/2009 10:40

gj =)

prof. chosen05/04/2009 18:37

Originally posted by DaFox
Try out h.264, xvid fails in comparison.

uhm no, xvid takes less time to render plus u can play it with a shitty computer so both are win.

n0k!06/04/2009 03:45

nice ) song name?

scimmy4cs07/04/2009 17:14

gj nub :D :*

st0ka07/04/2009 17:19

Can't get the point of quality tests in youtube... Else chosen. is right: both are win

Funksta 07/04/2009 17:21

Originally posted by st0ka
Can't get the point of quality tests in youtube... Else chosen. is right: both are win


yeah.. :|

V0ncH...07/04/2009 18:37

Originally posted by st0ka
Can't get the point of quality tests in youtube... Else chosen. is right: both are win


i uploaded @ yt, so ppl can see it -.- (lazy ppz aswell)

st0ka07/04/2009 18:57

So by seeing it you want their opinion for the quality right? How am I supposed to judge it if I can't see it in it's actual resolution and compression. How am I supposed to tell whether there are compression artifacts or not and so on and so forth. Thought I should make it a bit more clearer for you. ^

DaFox07/04/2009 20:44(edited 07/04/2009 20:46)

Originally posted by chosen.
Originally posted by DaFox
Try out h.264, xvid fails in comparison.

uhm no, xvid takes less time to render plus u can play it with a shitty computer so both are win.


Touche.

Based on quality and file size alone, h.264 > xvid hands down which is what this thread is about.
Happy? :p

prof. chosen07/04/2009 23:54

Originally posted by DaFox
Originally posted by chosen.
Originally posted by DaFox
Try out h.264, xvid fails in comparison.

uhm no, xvid takes less time to render plus u can play it with a shitty computer so both are win.


Touche.

Based on quality and file size alone, h.264 > xvid hands down which is what this thread is about.
Happy? :p

uhm im pretty sure this thread is ONLY about quality, so xvid is win too and even wmv and much more because u can just do a uber high bitrate and you get pwnage quality.

Happy.

Spaniolu08/04/2009 00:41

the quality is not that uber... look at the edge of the knife ...

noddan08/04/2009 07:52

well st0ka you can compare this vid to other vids to youtube , you know whats normal good for a movie quality on yt so you should easy be able to judge by jt movie ?

gen4y08/04/2009 10:51

Originally posted by Spaniolu
the quality is not that uber... look at the edge of the knife ...

+5

st0ka08/04/2009 12:58

Originally posted by noddan
well st0ka you can compare this vid to other vids to youtube , you know whats normal good for a movie quality on yt so you should easy be able to judge by jt movie ?

sambb - Flying steps looks like shit on youtube, does that mean the original file looks like shit as well? No.

V0ncH...09/04/2009 11:38

Originally posted by st0ka
Originally posted by noddan
well st0ka you can compare this vid to other vids to youtube , you know whats normal good for a movie quality on yt so you should easy be able to judge by jt movie ?

sambb - Flying steps looks like shit on youtube, does that mean the original file looks like shit as well? No.


i am just testing my colours ("skills" in 1st post) + the quality, i just wanted to upload yt for all lazy people, and check the quality on youtube.

--Download it, trust me, its worth it

Spaniolu09/04/2009 13:30(edited 09/04/2009 13:42)

watch this quality test please: http://www.sendspace.com/file/bla0e7

I used startmovie mov1 320
43mb/min
x264


Remember: more fps -> more smoothness -> more quality

st0ka09/04/2009 14:31(edited 09/04/2009 14:38)

Originally posted by Spaniolu
watch this quality test please: http://www.sendspace.com/file/bla0e7

I used startmovie mov1 320
43mb/min
x264


Remember: more fps -> more smoothness -> more quality

Ye also more playback issues and unrealistic look :D

Vonch the quality compared to your filesize was pretty good. Quality itself was good too but you have to fix your anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering in your graphic card settings. Set them to their maximum values or at least 8x for the anti-aliasing and 16x for the anisotropic filtering (think it was 8xS or something for nVidia video cards). The edges on the knife were choppy. These settings will fix the overall quality and will make the edges smoother. Enabling triple buffering might help as well.

P.S. Ehm Spanioulu all I got from your vid is black screen. :E

Page 1 of 2

Please log in to post replies.